The legal complexities of artificial intelligence are becoming increasingly urgent in the UK, as delays to the Data (Use and Access) Bill highlight deep concerns over AI’s role in data usage and copyright. With growing instances of data breaches, misinformation and intellectual property violations, businesses are being urged to adopt clear and robust guidelines for AI use.
Recent cases have seen sensitive data entered into open AI platforms, breaching data protection laws. Other incidents have involved users unknowingly infringing on copyright by using AI-generated content based on protected material. Meanwhile, inaccuracies in AI-generated documents have already led to legal claims, underscoring the dual threat of misuse and misinformation.
A major driver of concern is the lack of dedicated AI legislation. Existing laws are being stretched to apply to new technologies, creating confusion for businesses. While the UK government’s AI regulatory principles promote safety, transparency and fairness, many firms have embraced AI without fully considering the legal risks.
Data protection remains a key issue. AI systems typically process vast amounts of personal data, making compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation more critical than ever. As public demand grows for transparency in how data is used, businesses must prepare for greater scrutiny. US court rulings have already reinforced the importance of maintaining audit trails, with implications for UK firms facing potential data complaints or requests.
Intellectual property adds another layer of complexity. When AI generates content based on copyrighted works, it is unclear who bears responsibility for infringement: the user, the developer, or neither. There is also legal ambiguity around whether AI-generated content qualifies for copyright protection in the absence of human authorship.
Efforts to clarify these issues through legislation have faltered. In 2023, the UK government withdrew plans for a broad text and data mining exception following criticism from the creative industries. The fallout has contributed to the delays in the Data (Use and Access) Bill, leaving businesses to navigate a shifting regulatory environment on their own.
To manage this uncertainty, companies are advised to create clear internal policies for AI use, provide training for staff and monitor how AI systems operate. These processes can be integrated into existing structures to support compliance and reduce risk.
While AI promises powerful opportunities for innovation, it also raises significant legal and ethical challenges. With regulation lagging behind technology, businesses must take the lead in ensuring their use of AI is responsible, lawful and prepared for the future.
Created by Amplify: AI-augmented, human-curated content.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative discusses recent developments in the UK's Data (Use and Access) Bill, including debates over AI's role in data usage and the abandonment of proposals for a broad text and data mining exception in 2023. ([pinsentmasons.com](https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/uk-ai-copyright-code-initiative-abandoned?utm_source=openai)) These events occurred in 2023, indicating that the content is based on older material. However, the article includes updated data, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. ([computing.co.uk](https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2025/ai/government-rethinks-copyright-laws-favour-ai-companies?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes from various stakeholders. A search for the earliest known usage of these quotes is recommended to determine if they are original or reused. Variations in wording should be noted, and if no online matches are found, the content may be original or exclusive.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative originates from Elite Business Magazine, a UK-based publication. While it is a known outlet, its reputation and credibility are not as established as major news organisations. This warrants caution in assessing the reliability of the information presented.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims made in the narrative align with known events and discussions regarding AI and copyright in the UK. However, the reliance on a single source and the lack of corroboration from other reputable outlets raise concerns about the plausibility and potential for disinformation.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative presents information on the UK's Data (Use and Access) Bill and related AI and copyright issues. ([pinsentmasons.com](https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/uk-ai-copyright-code-initiative-abandoned?utm_source=openai)) While the content includes updated data, it is based on older material from 2023, which may affect its freshness. ([computing.co.uk](https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2025/ai/government-rethinks-copyright-laws-favour-ai-companies?utm_source=openai)) The quotes used should be verified for originality, and the source's reliability is moderate. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/19/uk-arts-and-media-reject-plan-to-let-ai-firms-use-copyrighted-material?utm_source=openai)) The plausibility of the claims is supported by known events, but the lack of corroboration from other reputable outlets raises concerns about potential disinformation. ([forbes.com](https://www.forbes.com/sites/virginieberger/2025/02/28/how-the-uks-ai-copyright-exception-hands-creators-work-to-big-tech-for-free/?utm_source=openai))