Figma has acquired AI start-up Weavy in a $200 million deal, rebranding the platform as Figma Weave in a move aimed at accelerating its integration of artificial intelligence into UI/UX design tools.
Figma Weave blends generative AI with professional editing capabilities, offering designers control across image, video, animation and multimedia elements. It includes access to leading models such as OpenAI’s Sora and has quickly built a strong user base—seen by Figma as proof of the product’s creative appeal.
The acquisition comes as Figma positions itself more aggressively against competitors like Adobe in the race to embed AI across design software. While the company’s stock dipped slightly following the announcement—amid broader market concerns about high AI spending—analysts note the move signals Figma’s long-term intent to lead in the AI design space.
Figma’s gross margins exceed 91% and its revenue growth remains strong, but the company is under pressure to balance investment in AI with sustainable profitability. The collapse of Adobe’s $20 billion bid for Figma, blocked by UK and EU regulators, leaves Figma as an independent competitor in a rapidly evolving market.
Industry observers warn that slow AI adoption could risk losing market share to nimble rivals. By acquiring Weavy, Figma is aiming to stay ahead in a sector where creative tools increasingly depend on AI functionality to attract and retain users.
Despite market volatility, Figma’s strategic push into AI—starting with this acquisition—demonstrates its ambition to shape the future of design software. As the UK and global tech sectors seek to lead in responsible AI innovation, moves like this highlight the importance of combining technical vision with careful execution.
Created by Amplify: AI-augmented, human-curated content.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative is fresh, with the earliest known publication date being October 30, 2025. The report is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. The content has not been republished across low-quality sites or clickbait networks. No earlier versions show different figures, dates, or quotes. The article includes updated data and does not recycle older material. No similar content has appeared more than 7 days earlier. The update justifies a higher freshness score but does not require flagging.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
No direct quotes were identified in the narrative. The absence of quotes suggests the content is potentially original or exclusive.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from a reputable organisation, The Motley Fool, known for its financial analysis and investment advice. This adds credibility to the report. However, the article does not provide direct links to primary sources or official statements, which slightly reduces the score.
Plausibility check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims made in the narrative are plausible and align with known industry trends. Figma's recent financial performance, including a 41% revenue increase to $250 million in Q2 2025, supports the narrative's context. The acquisition of Weavy, an AI-powered design workflows company, is consistent with Figma's strategic focus on AI integration. The narrative lacks specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, or dates, which slightly reduces the score. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic, and there is no excessive or off-topic detail. The tone is formal and resembles typical corporate language.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh, originating from a reputable organisation, and presents plausible claims supported by recent financial data. The absence of direct quotes and specific factual anchors slightly reduces the overall score but does not significantly impact the credibility of the report.