A new international study from Genesys lays bare a growing paradox at the heart of customer experience: consumers want AI to deliver faster, more personalised service, but they also expect strong safeguards—governance that many organisations still lack.
Surveying over 4,000 consumers and 1,600 customer experience and IT leaders across more than ten countries, including the Netherlands, the report finds four in five consumers want clear, organisation-wide rules for how AI systems interact with them. Yet only a third of business leaders say their organisation has a formal AI governance policy in place. At stake is the deployment of agentic AI—systems designed to think, decide and act with minimal human input—which is moving rapidly from experimental to mainstream in customer-facing operations.
Chief among consumer concerns are data transparency and the reliability of AI outputs. Around 37 percent worry about “hallucinations”—when AI systems generate false or misleading information. The concern is shared by 59 percent of customer experience leaders, who view hallucinations as a threat to brand loyalty and trust. While 91 percent agree that oversight protects brand reputation, more than a third admit their organisations are flying blind, with no formal oversight policies in place.
The trust gap is even starker around data handling. Over 80 percent of business leaders say they trust AI with sensitive customer data, but just 36 percent of consumers feel the same. Appetite for AI-powered speed and efficiency remains strong—91 percent of leaders expect agentic AI to make services more effective—but without transparency, these gains risk fuelling consumer scepticism and regulatory pushback.
Industry analysts see both risk and reward. Capgemini forecasts that agentic AI could deliver up to $450 billion in value by 2028, but warns that few organisations are ready to scale. The consultancy reports broad agreement—75 percent of leaders—that human oversight enhances AI’s benefits, and 93 percent see no cost penalty for keeping humans in the loop. The real value, Capgemini argues, lies in transparency and collaboration, not unchecked automation.
Some in the sector are already moving to close the governance gap. A Capgemini–NVIDIA partnership launched earlier this year offers enterprise-ready frameworks for agentic AI adoption, with data governance and compliance embedded into the tooling. Early use cases, such as Norway’s sovereign AI cloud via the Telenor AI Factory, showcase how localised, regulated AI infrastructure can balance innovation with accountability.
Deloitte’s consumer research echoes these findings. While enthusiasm for Gen AI is widespread in homes and workplaces, concerns about privacy and control remain front of mind. Consumers want transparent data practices and tools that let them manage how their information is used. Deloitte argues that trust must be earned through privacy-by-design and user-friendly controls.
The International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) also points to broader regulatory momentum. Drawing on findings from Pew and KPMG, it notes persistent public anxiety about privacy in the AI age, warning that corporate transparency and regulatory clarity are essential if businesses want to scale responsibly.
For UK firms, the message is clear: governance is no longer optional. The nation’s AI and data privacy ambitions depend on building systems that are not only powerful, but trusted. That means investing in human–AI collaboration, embedding privacy into design, and communicating clearly with customers about how AI is used and protected.
To lead responsibly, UK organisations should act on four fronts:
– Implement clear, organisation-wide AI governance, defining decision rights, data use and accountability.
– Preserve human oversight in high-risk areas such as identity verification, financial transactions and sensitive service touchpoints.
– Adopt privacy-by-design with controls that allow customers to manage their data and understand AI decisions.
– Communicate proactively, explaining the role of AI, the safeguards in place, and the benefits to service quality.
Consumers are not asking for less innovation—they are demanding more responsibility. With the right frameworks, the UK can meet this moment, turning governance from a compliance exercise into a competitive edge.
Created by Amplify: AI-augmented, human-curated content.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
7
Notes:
🕰️ Earliest substantially similar publication identified: Genesys press release dated 7 August 2025 (Genesys’ study summary and quotes). ([genesys.com](https://www.genesys.com/company/newsroom/announcements/genesys-study-finds-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ✅ The BI-Platform Dutch write-up appeared later (19 August 2025) and closely follows the Genesys material. ([biplatform.nl](https://biplatform.nl/2848454/agentic-ai-rukt-op-maar-gebrek-aan-toezicht-bedreigt-consumentenvertrouwen.html)) ⚠️ The narrative is press-release-driven and has been republished or syndicated across multiple outlets within days of the Genesys release (examples include CXOToday, Intelligent CIO and APN News), indicating low originality and heavy reliance on the PR. ([cxotoday.com](https://cxotoday.com/press-release/genesys-study-reveals-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [intelligentcio.com](https://www.intelligentcio.com/north-america/2025/08/08/genesys-report-exposes-ai-governance-gap-threatening-consumer-trust/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [apnnews.com](https://www.apnnews.com/genesys-study-reveals-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ‼️ Note: related industry reporting (Capgemini) pre-dates the Genesys release (Capgemini report published 16 July 2025) and is used as supporting context, not as the same study. ([capgemini.com](https://www.capgemini.com/us-en/news/press-releases/trust-and-human-ai-collaboration-set-to-define-the-next-era-of-agentic-ai-unlocking-450-billion-opportunity-by-2028/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) 🕰️ Because substantially similar content (the Genesys release) appeared more than 7 days before the BI-Platform piece, flag as recycled/PR-driven coverage rather than an exclusive or freshly reported investigation.
Quotes check
Score:
6
Notes:
✅ Direct quotations and specific phrasings (for example, Genesys’ quoted comment from Olivier Jouve and the exact numeric findings) first appear in the Genesys announcement (7 August 2025). ([genesys.com](https://www.genesys.com/company/newsroom/announcements/genesys-study-finds-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ⚠️ Many downstream outlets reproduce those quotations verbatim or closely paraphrase them, which reduces originality for later reprints such as the BI-Platform post. ([biplatform.nl](https://biplatform.nl/2848454/agentic-ai-rukt-op-maar-gebrek-aan-toezicht-bedreigt-consumentenvertrouwen.html), [apnnews.com](https://www.apnnews.com/genesys-study-reveals-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ❗ The BI-Platform version largely summarises the PR and industry material; it does not present independently verified new quotes or interview material — so any identical quotes in coverage should be treated as PR re-use rather than exclusive reporting. 🕵️ If the narrative claimed exclusive interview material or novel quotes, that claim would be unsupported.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
✅ The narrative cites recognised organisations: Genesys (vendor; primary PR origin), Capgemini Research Institute (peer industry research), Deloitte (Connected Consumer study), and IAPP (privacy analysis). ([genesys.com](https://www.genesys.com/company/newsroom/announcements/genesys-study-finds-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [capgemini.com](https://www.capgemini.com/us-en/news/press-releases/trust-and-human-ai-collaboration-set-to-define-the-next-era-of-agentic-ai-unlocking-450-billion-opportunity-by-2028/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [www2.deloitte.com](https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/telecommunications/connectivity-mobile-trends-survey.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [iapp.org](https://iapp.org/resources/article/consumer-perspectives-of-privacy-and-ai/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ✅ Capgemini and Deloitte are reputable research producers; IAPP is a respected privacy professional body. ⚠️ Genesys is a commercial vendor whose press release promotes its perspective and product context (potential bias); the BI-Platform piece is effectively re-reporting that PR. ([genesys.com](https://www.genesys.com/company/newsroom/announcements/genesys-study-finds-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [biplatform.nl](https://biplatform.nl/2848454/agentic-ai-rukt-op-maar-gebrek-aan-toezicht-bedreigt-consumentenvertrouwen.html)) ⚠️ Some smaller aggregators republishing the PR (e.g. APN News) have lower editorial standards — flag these as syndicated PR reproductions rather than independent verification. ([apnnews.com](https://www.apnnews.com/genesys-study-reveals-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
Plausability check
Score:
7
Notes:
✅ Key time-sensitive claims check out against primary documents: Genesys’ survey (4,000 consumers, 1,600 CX/IT leaders) conducted June 2025 and published in a Genesys announcement on 7 August 2025; Capgemini’s $450bn estimate appears in its July 16, 2025 report; the Capgemini–NVIDIA initiative was announced 19 March 2025; Deloitte’s 2024 Connected Consumer research and IAPP analyses are consistent background context. ([genesys.com](https://www.genesys.com/company/newsroom/announcements/genesys-study-finds-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [capgemini.com](https://www.capgemini.com/us-en/news/press-releases/trust-and-human-ai-collaboration-set-to-define-the-next-era-of-agentic-ai-unlocking-450-billion-opportunity-by-2028/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [globenewswire.com](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/03/19/3045132/0/en/index.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [www2.deloitte.com](https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/telecommunications/connectivity-mobile-trends-survey.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [iapp.org](https://iapp.org/resources/article/consumer-perspectives-of-privacy-and-ai/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ⚠️ The narrative combines vendor PR findings with industry reports — plausible but promotional in framing. ‼️ Where claims are surprising (for example, specific percentages or readiness assertions), independent third‑party confirmation beyond the PR is limited; coverage appears driven by the Genesys release rather than fresh, independent investigation. ⚠️ Recommendation: treat numeric claims as PR-originated findings and prefer to cite the primary Genesys release or the underlying survey dossier when using these figures.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
⚠️ The narrative is credible in that it accurately reflects a Genesys study published via a Genesys press announcement (San Francisco, 7 August 2025) and is corroborated by recognisable industry reports (Capgemini, Deloitte, IAPP). ([genesys.com](https://www.genesys.com/company/newsroom/announcements/genesys-study-finds-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [capgemini.com](https://www.capgemini.com/us-en/news/press-releases/trust-and-human-ai-collaboration-set-to-define-the-next-era-of-agentic-ai-unlocking-450-billion-opportunity-by-2028/?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [www2.deloitte.com](https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/telecommunications/connectivity-mobile-trends-survey.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [iapp.org](https://iapp.org/resources/article/consumer-perspectives-of-privacy-and-ai/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ✅ Major strengths: factual alignment with primary documents, transparent citation of industry research, and timely relevance (survey June 2025; PR published 7 Aug 2025). 🕰️ Major risks: the BI-Platform item is largely a reworking of a vendor press release published earlier (so originality is low) and many outlets have syndicated the same PR text — this raises the risk that assertions are promotional framing rather than independently verified journalism. ([biplatform.nl](https://biplatform.nl/2848454/agentic-ai-rukt-op-maar-gebrek-aan-toezicht-bedreigt-consumentenvertrouwen.html), [apnnews.com](https://www.apnnews.com/genesys-study-reveals-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)) ‼️ Key recommendation for editors: label the piece clearly as PR-driven or a summary of a vendor study, link to the Genesys release and the Capgemini report for primary data, and, if making high-stakes decisions on the basis of the percentages, seek the underlying survey questionnaire and methodology or independent replication. ([genesys.com](https://www.genesys.com/company/newsroom/announcements/genesys-study-finds-agentic-ai-is-advancing-but-governance-gaps-threaten-consumer-trust?utm_source=chatgpt.com), [capgemini.com](https://www.capgemini.com/us-en/news/press-releases/trust-and-human-ai-collaboration-set-to-define-the-next-era-of-agentic-ai-unlocking-450-billion-opportunity-by-2028/?utm_source=chatgpt.com))