UK and global companies are moving to centralise AI decision-making at the top, with the share of AI leaders reporting directly to chief executives jumping from 17% to 31% in the past year, according to Heidrick & Struggles. The firm warns that without senior accountability, businesses risk fragmented efforts and missed value.
Board agendas, once light on AI, now regularly probe risks from model bias to employee wellbeing. Some firms are pairing leadership elevation with director training and staff education. Mastercard’s Chief AI and Data Officer, Greg Ulrich, leads a centre of excellence covering risk, bias and regulatory engagement, while AXA’s “Secure GPT” platform and AI academy have drawn thousands of employee sign-ups in their first week.
An IBM Institute for Business Value survey suggests the shift is overdue: only 16% of AI projects have scaled enterprise-wide, often due to skills gaps and disjointed systems. Experts say the winning formula combines a senior AI point-person, secure enterprise tools for experimentation, and governance frameworks linking model performance to business KPIs and workforce outcomes.
With its financial, professional and tech strengths, the UK is well placed to lead on this “human-centred” AI model — if boards, HR and tech chiefs invest together in governance, training and measurable delivery. Early movers show the payoff: tighter alignment between AI strategy, risk management and the people who will use the tools.
Created by Amplify: AI-augmented, human-curated content.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative was published on August 15, 2025, and does not appear to be recycled or republished from earlier sources. The data from Heidrick & Struggles' 2024 survey is recent and relevant. The article provides new insights into the increasing prominence of AI leadership roles within organizations.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The direct quotes from Jenni Hibbert and Kathryn Parsons are unique to this narrative and do not appear in earlier material. No identical quotes were found in prior publications. This suggests the content is original and potentially exclusive.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from HRreview, a UK-based publication focusing on human resources and workplace issues. While HRreview is a specialized outlet, it is not as widely recognized as major international news organizations. The reliance on Heidrick & Struggles' survey data adds credibility, but the overall reliability is moderate.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims about the rise of AI leadership roles are consistent with recent industry trends. The data from Heidrick & Struggles' 2024 survey aligns with other reports indicating an increase in AI leadership positions. The narrative provides specific examples and quotes that support its claims, enhancing its plausibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is fresh, original, and supported by recent data from a reputable source. The quotes are unique and the claims are plausible, aligning with current industry trends. The source's reliability is moderate due to its specialized nature, but the overall assessment is positive.