Generative AI is already in daily use for an estimated seven million UK workers, with tasks from email triage to research benefiting from automation. TechRadar Pro reports that 58% of organisations believe AI could narrow the productivity gap — yet “shadow AI” is rising just as fast.
Surveys by Salesforce show that nearly 40% of employees using AI tools do so via apps their employer has banned, while Cyberhaven telemetry recorded a 485% year-on-year jump in corporate data being fed into public models, often from personal accounts. IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach report found AI-related breaches added an average US$670,000 to incident costs, with poor access controls a major factor.
Analysts say the fix is clear:
- Inventory AI use and track data flows to uncover unsanctioned activity.
- Apply zero-trust principles to model access, matching permissions to role and purpose.
- Enforce DLP and access controls to limit what sensitive data reaches external tools.
- Offer secure, approved AI services so staff aren’t tempted to “bring their own”.
- Train staff in safe, ethical AI use, backed by clear policy.
- Automate SOC workflows with SOAR to detect and contain incidents faster.
- Monitor and adapt controls as tools and risks evolve.
The goal, experts stress, is not to block innovation but to channel it. With transparent governance, secure tooling and embedded trust, UK firms can capture AI’s productivity promise while protecting the data and reputation on which long-term competitiveness depends.
Created by Amplify: AI-augmented, human-curated content.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative was published on August 13, 2025, making it highly current. While similar discussions on 'shadow AI' have appeared in recent months, this specific report provides new insights and data, indicating originality. No evidence of recycled content or significant discrepancies with earlier versions was found. The inclusion of updated data and recent studies justifies a high freshness score. No earlier versions with different figures, dates, or quotes were identified. The narrative is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No republishing across low-quality sites or clickbait networks was observed. No similar content appeared more than 7 days earlier. The article includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
The direct quotes from Samantha Wessels, Head of EMEA at Box, are unique to this narrative. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating originality. No variations in quote wording were found. No online matches for the quotes were found, raising the score but flagging as potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from TechRadar Pro, a reputable technology news outlet. The author, Samantha Wessels, is identified as the Head of EMEA at Box, a known company. No evidence suggests that the author or the company is unverifiable or fabricated. The source is reliable, but the reliance on a press release may introduce some bias.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims about the rise of 'shadow AI' and its associated risks are consistent with recent studies and reports. For instance, a Software AG study found that half of all employees are using non-company issued AI tools. ([enterprisetimes.co.uk](https://www.enterprisetimes.co.uk/2024/10/23/new-software-ag-study-finds-half-of-all-employees-are-shadow-ai-users/?utm_source=openai)) The narrative provides specific data points and actionable steps for UK organisations, enhancing its credibility. The language and tone are consistent with professional business communication. No excessive or off-topic detail unrelated to the claim was noted. The tone is appropriately formal and aligns with typical corporate language.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is current, original, and sourced from a reputable outlet. The quotes are unique, and the claims are consistent with recent studies, enhancing credibility. No significant issues were identified, leading to a high confidence in the assessment.