The UK must rapidly overhaul its AI infrastructure or risk losing ground in the global technology race, according to a new report by the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (TBI). The report describes the country’s current infrastructure as “dire,” warning that limited compute capacity could lead to increased reliance on foreign powers and compromise national and economic security.
Despite a £1 billion government commitment to boost computing power and an AI action plan, tech leaders argue these steps are insufficient. The UK holds just 3% of global computing power, compared with the US at 75%. Meanwhile, nations including China, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily in AI supercomputing.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has declared his aim for the UK to be a “maker, not a taker” of AI infrastructure. Plans include AI Growth Zones—regions that would allow fast-tracked data centre development by waiving some planning restrictions and offering preferential energy terms. However, these proposals have sparked internal tensions, particularly with the Department for Energy, which has raised concerns about environmental strain and energy grid resilience.
Jamie Hutton, CTO of British analytics firm Quantexa, said infrastructure investment is not optional but “key to unlocking long-term prosperity, national resilience and global competitiveness.” The TBI report calls for sweeping reforms, including a restructured planning regime and significant energy expansion, such as new nuclear power projects, to meet AI's massive compute demands.
It also proposes a Whitehall-based AI Infrastructure Delivery Group, modelled on the COVID-era Vaccine Taskforce, to drive coordination across departments and with external partners like Ofgem and the National Grid.
While the UK may struggle to match nations with vast training resources, the report urges a focus on deploying AI across public services such as health, education, defence and research. This could enable broad productivity gains and position the UK as a global leader in AI adoption rather than frontier model development.
Regulatory progress is also under way. Following the November AI Safety Summit and the appointment of Peter Kyle as science and technology minister, the Labour government is pursuing binding rules for powerful models, deepfake restrictions and mandatory AI testing transparency. These measures aim to balance rapid innovation with public trust.
The UK’s AI sector remains vibrant, but the report makes clear that foundational investment in compute capacity, energy resilience and government coordination will be decisive. Without urgent action, the country’s ambition to lead in responsible AI development may be overtaken by better-prepared rivals.
Created by Amplify: AI-augmented, human-curated content.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative is recent, published on July 29, 2025. The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change's report is new, with no evidence of prior publication. The article includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. The report has been republished across various outlets, including low-quality sites and clickbait networks. The narrative is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were found. No earlier versions show different figures, dates, or quotes. No similar content appeared more than 7 days earlier. The article includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
Direct quotes from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change's report and Jamie Hutton, CTO of Quantexa, are used. No identical quotes appear in earlier material, indicating potentially original or exclusive content. No online matches were found for the quotes, raising the score but flagging as potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from Sifted, a reputable organisation. The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change is a well-known think tank. The CTO of Quantexa, Jamie Hutton, is a verifiable individual with a public presence. No unverifiable entities or individuals are mentioned.
Plausability check
Score:
7
Notes:
The claims about the UK's AI infrastructure and the need for reform are plausible and align with current discussions. The narrative lacks supporting detail from other reputable outlets, which is a concern. The report lacks specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates, which reduces the score and flags it as potentially synthetic. The language and tone are consistent with the region and topic. The structure is focused and relevant, with no excessive or off-topic detail. The tone is formal and appropriate for the subject matter.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative is recent and based on a new report from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, with no evidence of prior publication. The quotes used are potentially original or exclusive. The source is reputable, and the individuals mentioned are verifiable. However, the narrative lacks supporting detail from other reputable outlets and specific factual anchors, which raises concerns about its plausibility. The language and tone are appropriate, and the structure is focused. Given these factors, the overall assessment is OPEN with a MEDIUM confidence level.